"Terminology of beings" a belief of self-thoughts and belief in our material world as well as our terminology on scientific and moral descriptions.
Image Source: Google Images
I'm sharing this post not for criticizing any personal belief but endeavor my best to sort out the problem that wobble some social as well as scientific beliefs. Let's start, well, I don't know how and why we beings are underpin by some mysterious forces in nature as well as in society, of course? Where, some forces are weird and some are tenantry elixir for everyone at least we observe and believe on ourselves without being harsh to our mind.
However, it's a time for "soft voice" vs. "reality of beings" a part of life. Here the former manifests the voice of those people who needs "rights" and perhaps this term "rights" is not meaningful, why because there is a need of "Universal Equality" that somewhere apocalypse and still we are in hurry to want a speedy consequence: might not possible here to differentiate what is "right"? and what is "Universal reality"? but stick with this statement as we are in our later opponent "reality of beings". Well, here we all are uncertain and it is something introvert for all of us, maybe we need scientific description or moral description but now on which statement we should have to concentrate: "Scientific description"or "moral description"? Obviously, we choose "moral description" because we are socially bounded and hence want some moral values, nevertheless we forget our deeds and never want to remember and questioning to ourselves "Are we really free?" or "Still need an another tyranny stuff?" If not so, then what we would want to choose "scientific description", really this going to be pragmatically muddle for us as we are socially bounded as I said in my previous statement, then what we will choose? For me, I am scientific being without being harsh to other beings / persons but what about you? If you are socially bounded then what about your thoughts and what about your deeds as per your own need? Is this a culture of religion or a culture of rationalism? where "rationalism" tells us how one should be rational without being a "self" and always think positive to others and also himself / herself. If I am scientific, I don't need moral values, is this right for me even for you also? I know your answer is "No" but for me this is "Yes". Reasons are inside your "Within" and what "within" do is to nourish your inner thoughts and what you want to speak to others incredibly transfer to your mind and your well-defined perception accept your words or what you speak and your performance is good for other persons at least for your own "Belief" (Not a faith). Why I say, not a faith because "faith" leads us to the limbic system of mind and this leads us to believe in "religion" and what "religion" is a faith and beyond this faith, one never knows where is his / her "Moral Judgement" then where goes his / her moral description? Here his / her moral description for others is right but for "faith" / "Religion" might shattered and feel absurd, what to do now?
Well, when we are beginners or better to say learners we feel that we are our own teacher and when we know little bit about prescribed subjects / topic whether it is social, political, scientific, art, culture or any other subject then we become ourselves an invincible beings / person and might think that we become our own "God" to teach ourselves without being need anyone to teach or tell us. For science perspective, one day we will be in that supposition but according to religion we will still an adherent of some past legends or our creators and nevertheless, become a part of their world (definitely after death). Here again, supposition contradicts, "Is there any need of two propositions then we would be able to understand the uncertainty of two suppositions (one where we are learner and other where we are our self-god)? I, when ask this question from your or anyone then the result is not mind-boggling because, I know and you also that these are two suppositions and on this planet earth we are in numerous in numbers (in case of population): so answer is explicit, our inherent belongs to our own perception and what we think never contradicts our senses because we are probably a perceptional being except "Qualia Concept" (Read more about #Qualia concept on Wikipedia). Question again arises here, why we are perceptional beings as we are in a mesh of worldly lust and of course material desire also. Solely, our desires too know how far we are from our extents but without knowing the solecism of our material desires so as to root cause for "materialism".
Although, materialism doesn't affect our technological or scientific mind but rather it ceases our path to reach our incredible fate (still depend on our present chores). My intention in this post is only to manifest how person / being is intertwined with some materialistic causes: and also with scientific abilities. If we remove the concept of mind then "Would we able to do sin or any crime?" if so, then what about me: "Could I consider myself a sinner and what's my perception about myself?" Hardly, but adequately I recognized myself a "being" without any material or scientific cause but what if I have a mind and I become "brutal" for those who never expect such kind of behavior to me? Perhaps, in this situation, I will become my own sinner and when my deeds reflects with others beings (whether in a field of science or any social chores) then I would be a "Mind Sinner" (not for asylum world) but my mind is null for me even "me" takes my "inner belief". So, I question to myself (at least for now in my present mental state for this post or my prescribed question), "Will I able to understand the world without being "violent" or without any "inequality" or any "sex harassment"? For me at that current moment, I can because I know what is wrong and what is right. But what for those, who never want to think what is right and what is wrong? Suppose, I am writing a post and want to learn new things from my post, which means I need additional time and additional knowledge about my post then what I do now? Either research for good knowledge or bad knowledge but for me, I consider good, why because I know my involvement never be a sundry and I always be a learner: and endeavor to learn new things in my life without being contaminated.
But at the same time, my side reflection has been sitting with me then what about its thought, will he also research for good knowledge? Probability here is 50:50, reason is clear and not implicit as for our concern we know the probability of mine and for my "side reflection" he may or may not want to adhere my concept, if he adheres my concept on following a good knowledge then I am "Being Within" if not then "Being withself" as according to these terminology: nature here accepts both these conditions. But for us, we prefer only one because of the presence of good knowledge. Again here, we sometimes become a critics of nature and embellish our ideas with some freaking critics. Nature knows our "Mind's terminology" but we are unable to understand what is happening with our mind and obviously to us?
Consequently, my aim here not to criticizing nature, our laws, people, religion, science and some other beliefs but to manifests how our mind works in "Duality" and not is a part of "sin" but a probability to become a "sinner" that is a part of "geometry of the mind". However, no one is "sinner" on this planet earth but a way to think and being without "fearless perception" can do several crimes: and also is a cause for future technological as well as social apocalypse.